🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are observing closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are moving toward parallel bans.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that phones and platforms are "robbing our kids' childhood". The policy is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to enact a proposal lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised guardians to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is given. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," commented one MEP supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the government has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by strong research".

Earlier, interest built behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration committed to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. An organization set up by the family of a young person who was lost after viewing harmful online content suggests that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly happening at the state level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with additional time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed measures mandating adult authorization for minors to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain figures to mimic this path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Views

Beyond these regions, further countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations take a more cautious stance. Unicef has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

As this global conversation evolves, the actions of Australia and its followers indicate that states globally are increasingly content to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.